The truth about Daya Nayak: Infamy in the Times...Getting personal!
The truth about Daya Nayak: Infamy in the Times...Getting personal!
Well, as you said it truly shows how the media works in India. Highly deplorable are the journalists who file news reports without research and checking their veracity of the facts they mention.
To remind Mr. Thomas, his very own the illustrious Times of India, in its edition of Sunday January 22, 2006 in its front-page headlines had screamt: Swiss Flat, Dubai Hotel @12k salary - a highly fictitious report- which had actually made me look at the date on the calendar imagining it to be April 1.
Mr. Thomas and his ilk at the Times of India, should read their own publication’s front page of February 9, 2006 and well, it mentions Nayak, as per ACB, is being inquired for a disproportionate income of 41 lakhs.
Why this turn around and isn’t that contradictory. Well, was the first report born out the wacky imagination of the journalist who wanted to cook up a good copy?
I guess Times of India is running a smearing campaign against Daya Nayak, and is bent on pronouncing him guilty and is trying its very best to " influence" the judiciary and the public at large by such baseless and completely fictitious reports.
As a sign off may I ask Mr. Thomas, and all his well intentioned friends at the Times to log into a site run by someone called Ketan Tirodkar-(www.dial100dotcom.worldbreak.com) and decide what’s contempt of court and abusing the judiciary. It’s a SHAME and irony that the media or rather Times takes note of a blogsite and takes opinion from legal bigwigs. Mr. Thomas, you may read the Ketan Tirodkar blogsite and you may open the eyes to the fact if this blog is contempt of court, then Ketan Tirodkar should be immediately put behind bars for waging war against the state, and also being mentally insane.
Well, then by all yards, punkprincess is a saint. Go ahead punkprincess and all the bloggers--it’s your right to blog and speak openly about what you feel- a blog is attributed to independent views and it can’t be curtailed.
And meanwhile, well we should thank Mr. Thomas and the Times on hindsight for getting us more "hits".
MANTRA22
Well, as you said it truly shows how the media works in India. Highly deplorable are the journalists who file news reports without research and checking their veracity of the facts they mention.
To remind Mr. Thomas, his very own the illustrious Times of India, in its edition of Sunday January 22, 2006 in its front-page headlines had screamt: Swiss Flat, Dubai Hotel @12k salary - a highly fictitious report- which had actually made me look at the date on the calendar imagining it to be April 1.
Mr. Thomas and his ilk at the Times of India, should read their own publication’s front page of February 9, 2006 and well, it mentions Nayak, as per ACB, is being inquired for a disproportionate income of 41 lakhs.
Why this turn around and isn’t that contradictory. Well, was the first report born out the wacky imagination of the journalist who wanted to cook up a good copy?
I guess Times of India is running a smearing campaign against Daya Nayak, and is bent on pronouncing him guilty and is trying its very best to " influence" the judiciary and the public at large by such baseless and completely fictitious reports.
As a sign off may I ask Mr. Thomas, and all his well intentioned friends at the Times to log into a site run by someone called Ketan Tirodkar-(www.dial100dotcom.worldbreak.com) and decide what’s contempt of court and abusing the judiciary. It’s a SHAME and irony that the media or rather Times takes note of a blogsite and takes opinion from legal bigwigs. Mr. Thomas, you may read the Ketan Tirodkar blogsite and you may open the eyes to the fact if this blog is contempt of court, then Ketan Tirodkar should be immediately put behind bars for waging war against the state, and also being mentally insane.
Well, then by all yards, punkprincess is a saint. Go ahead punkprincess and all the bloggers--it’s your right to blog and speak openly about what you feel- a blog is attributed to independent views and it can’t be curtailed.
And meanwhile, well we should thank Mr. Thomas and the Times on hindsight for getting us more "hits".
MANTRA22

